This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Helene L. Taylor

California Family Law Consulting Attorney & Legal Strategist

  • Home
  • About
    • Reviews
    • In the News
  • Speak to Me

Did your spouse acquire a community property interest in your separate property house? (Moore-Marsden)

Helene L Taylor

Home on Stinson Beach California

You inherited or received real estate as a gift before or during marriage, or bought a house before getting married. You used your salaries, bonuses, commissions, or other income earned during marriage to make improvements or pay the mortgage principal on the property. You don’t have a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement. You did not transfer title of your separate property house to your spouse or partner during marriage. Now, you’re legally separating or dissolving a domestic partnership or marriage in California, and your spouse or partner is claiming that he/she co-owns or has a community property interest in the house.

You want to know if the claim has merit? Yes, the claim has merit.

When a person owns a house before marriage and uses community property to pay the mortgage during the marriage or after separation, under California law, the community acquires a growing interest in the separate property house as the community funds increase the property equity. This rule applies even if title to the property remains in the name of the original owner.

How much of an interest does the community acquire in the separate property house?

The Moore-Marsden rule is the formula a judge will use to apportion, and determine the separate and community property interests in a separate property house.

The California Court of Appeals’ opinions for Marriage of Marsden (1982) 130 CA3d 426 and Marriage of Moore (1980) 28 C3d 366, provide in part:

If community property is used to reduce the mortgage principal or increase the equity in a spouse’s separate property house, the community acquires an ownership interest in the home; and

Ultimately, the disposition of the house is a reflection of the community and separate property percentage and cash interests in the house at the time of a trial.

California Family Code Section 760 defines community property as follows:

Except as otherwise provided by statute, all property, real or personal, wherever situated, acquired by a married person during the marriage while domiciled in California is community property.

California Family Code Section 770 defines separate property as follows:

(a) Separate property of a married person includes all of the following:

(1) All property owned by the person before marriage.

(2) All property acquired by the person after marriage by gift, bequest, devise, or descent.

(3) The rents, issues, and profits of the property described in this section.

Moore-Marsden Calculation 

In lay-speak, the court’s opinions in Marriage of Moore and Marriage of Marsden and California Family Code Sections 760 and 770 mean:

  1. If a person buys a house before getting married and doesn’t legally transmute (transform) the character of the house from separate to community property by way of a prenuptial or legal transmutation agreement or Deed, the house is separate property
  2. Unless a couple has a premarital or postnuptial agreement stating otherwise, spouses’ salaries, bonuses, commissions, etc. earned during marriage are community property
  3. If asked, a California family law judge must divide community property equally in a Legal Separation or Dissolution of Marriage or Domestic Partnership.
  4. If salaries, bonuses, commissions, etc. earned by a spouse during marriage are used to reduce the mortgage principal or increase the equity in a spouse’s separate property house, the community acquires an ownership interest in the home
  5. The formula for calculating the community property interest in the separate property house at the time of trial (or settlement conference) is in the California Court of Appeals opinion for Marriage of Marsden (1982) 130 CA3d 426 – it’s often referred to in the trade as Moore-Marsden.

Moore-Marsden Calculation

Step One: Gather the following relevant facts:

  1. Date of marriage
  2. Date of separation
  3. Date of house purchase
  4. Purchase price
  5. Title on Deed
  6. Type of Deed
  7. Amount of down payment
  8. Down payment paid by
  9. Source of down payment (i.e. premarital income, inheritance)
  10. Principal mortgage balance on date of purchase
  11. Secondary loan balance(s) on date of purchase
  12. Amount of principal paid by the homeowner spouse before the date of marriage
  13. Amount of principal paid by the homeowner spouse after the date of separation from a separate property source
  14. Amount of principal paid with community property funds from date of marriage to the date of separation
  15. Amount of principal paid with community property funds from the date of separation to the date of trial or settlement
  16. Premarital home appreciation (value of home on date of marriage minus purchase price)
  17. Value of home at the time of trial
  18. Appreciation of the house from the date of marriage through the date of trial or settlement

Step Two: Calculate the percentages that determine the separate and community property interests in the appreciation of the home after the date of marriage and before trial:

Separate property percentage = (Down payment + (separate property loan – community property payments))/ divided by the purchase price)

Community property percentage = (community property payments that reduced the separate property loan(s) principal/ divided by the purchase price)

Step Three: Calculate the following cash interests:

Separate property cash interest = separate property down payment +principal loan payments paid with separate property before marriage +principal loan payments paid after separation with separate property funds + all premarital appreciation + separate property percentage of the appreciation during marriage through the date of trial

Community property cash interest = community property principal loan payments + community property percentage of marital appreciation

Step Four: Calculate the cash interests to award to the separate property homeowner and his/her spouse or partner

Award to separate property homeowner spouse = Separate property cash interest + one-half of community property cash interest

Award to non-homeowner spouse = one-half of community property cash interest

To illustrate, here are the facts, formula, and outcome or disposition in Marriage of Marsden (1982) 130 CA3d 426:

Facts: H bought a home before marriage for $38,300. H paid $8,300 down and executed a $30,000 purchase money trust deed loan for the balance. Title was taken solely in H’s name. At the time of H’s marriage to W (nine years after purchasing the residence), H had made a total of $7,000 loan payments that reduced the loan principal balance and the property had increased in value to $65,000 ($26,700 premarital appreciation). H used his post-separation earnings (separate property) to further reduce the loan principal by an additional $655. The balance of the loan at the time of trial was $13,145.

During marriage and prior to the date of separation, the community made$9,200 in payments that reduced the principal loan balance. At time of trial, the property was worth $182,500 ($117,500 appreciation between date of marriage and date of trial).

Formula: 

Separate property percentage: 75.98% = ($8,300 down payment + ($30,000 separate property loan – $9,200 community property payments)) /divided by the $38,300 purchase price)

Community property percentage: 24.02% = ($9,200 community property payments that reduced the separate property loan(s) principal /divided by the$38,300 purchase price)

Separate property cash interest: $131,931.5 =$8,300 separate property downpayment +$7,000 separate property  before marriage principal loan payments +$655 post-separation separate property principal loan payments +$26,700 premarital appreciation +  $89,276.50 separate property percentage of the appreciation during marriage ($117,500*75.98%)

Community property cash interest: $37,423.50 =$9,200 community property principal loan payments + $28,223.50 community property percentage of the appreciation from the date of marriage through the date of trial ($117,500*24.02%)

Outcome/Disposition:

H was awarded the separate property interest of $131,931.50 plus one-half of the community interest of $18,711.75 ($37,423.50/2) for a total of $150,643.25. W was awarded one-half of the community property interest of $18,711.75 ($37,423.50/2). H was responsible for the balance due on the loan.

If H wanted to keep the home, he would have to pay his wife $18,711.75. If W wanted to keep the home, she would have to pay H $131,931.50 and assume or refinance the loan.

A few final notes:

  1. The Moore-Marsden rule and formula applies to the disposition of commercial or residential property (See Marriage of Frick (1986) 181 CA3d 997)
  2. The Moore-Marsden formula does not determine the disposition of property acquired during marriage, even if funded by one spouse’s separate property
  3. Mortgage interest, property tax, maintenance, and utility payments aren’t taken into consideration in the Moore-Marsden formula
  4. The community also acquires an interest in a separate property when the spouses or partners refinance and pay off a separate property mortgage with a new loan (In re Marriage of Branco (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 1621)
  5. You can learn more about Moore-Marsden in Hogoboom & King, California Practice Guide: Family Law (Rutter) Section 8:295
  6. The California Appellate Court recently published a new opinion on the Moore-Marsden formula that is quite easy to read. See Marriage of Mohler
  7. When a trial court determines the value of the community’s property interest in a residence, it values the property at the date of trial, not the date of the parties’ separation unless there are equitable reasons to do otherwise. (California Family Code Section 2552(a); In re Marriage of Sherman (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 795)
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Blog, California Family Law, Divorce, Method, Property community property, house, separate property

Helene L Taylor

Helene L. Taylor, California Family Law Consulting Attorney, Legal Strategist, Peace Activist

It’s easy to see divorce as a painful path you must walk alone without the expertise of a lawyer because you don’t know who to trust. But compassionate competent  advice is available and empowers you to solve salient problems consciously.

I’m Helene L. Taylor. I’m a former San Francisco trial lawyer who has, for 27 years, worked with the most formidable attorneys, judges, and experts in Hawaii and California. I’ve helped over a thousand people mediate, litigate, and resolve contentious complex divorce issues in Marin, OC, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Napa, LA, Silicon Valley, and beyond. I’m also divorced.

If you want trustworthy legal advice and strategies you can use to navigate the legal system and negotiate settlement agreements, Speak to Me.

CLIENT PRAISE

"Helene understands human behavior, and has a gift for deescalating conflict. I felt safe with Helene representing me during a complicated divorce. We've been friends ever since my divorce sixteen years ago." ~Toni Wroolie, PhD, Clinical Associate Professor, Psychiatry, Stanford University Medicine

"When I realized that I was getting a divorce I knew I needed to find a guide. She’d need to be smart, soulful, kind, and know her way around the legal system like nobody’s business. I loved working with Helene because she covered all of those bases beautifully, and she made it possible for me to move through my divorce with peace of mind and confidence" ~Laurie Wagner, 27powers.org

"Helene gently challenged me to consider which outcome would be best for my daughter and I, and gave me the courage and consistency I needed to pursue it successfully. I learned so much about myself as a result. Helene's is a compassionate and strategic approach. On a personal level, Helene is exceptionally positive and inspiring. I feel blessed to have received Helene's help through a challenging divorce during the pandemic." ~NC, Mother, Los Angeles Small Business Owner
Helene L Taylor

Receive Love Notes from Helene

* indicates required
Maritial Status (choose 1)

search

All are Welcome

“Helene’s answers put a smile on my face, and gave me great hope about the path I am taking.”

Latest Posts

  • Why do wealthy women marry? Jeff Bezos’s former spouse Mackenzie Scott Remarries, and JLo ponders the need for marriage
  • Who will keep the house in a California divorce?
  • Can you withdraw $200,000 penalty-free from a retirement account under the CARES Act in 2020?

Post Categories

BY APPOINTMENT

Marin County California
100 Shoreline Highway Mill Valley, California 94941

San Francisco, California
One Market Street, California 94105
Email: hello(at)heleneltaylor.com
Phone: 415-968-3028
Fax: 415-329-2019

Serving Marin & San Francisco California & Hawaii since 2001 & 1994.
Copyright 2017. Helene L. Taylor. Terms, Conditions & Disclaimers. Privacy Policy.

Privacy Policy

“May those who find themselves in trackless, fearful wildernesses—the children, the aged, the unprotected—be guarded by beneficent celestials.”

“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God.”