This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
Please click the consent button to view this website.
I accept
Deny cookies Go Back

Helene L. Taylor

California Family Law Consulting Attorney & Legal Strategist

  • Home
  • About
    • Reviews
    • In the News
  • Speak to Me

California community property explained

Helene

House on Stinson Beach Marin County California

Jack and Jane fell in love, and Jane moved into Jack’s San Francisco apartment that he had purchased and paid off years earlier. Two years later, Jack and Jane married and bought a second home in Sausalito. The couple used Jack’s bonuses earned during marriage for the down payment and paid the mortgage out of Jack and Jane’s monthly salaries. No improvements were made to Jack’s apartment or the Sausalito house during marriage.

Jack and Jane don’t have a prenuptial or any postnuptial agreements, and the only estate planning documents they signed are simple Wills stating that, in the event of either spouse’s death, the other shall receive the deceased’s estate. Title to the San Francisco apartment read: “Jack, a single man.” Title to the Sausalito house reads: “Jack and Jane, as joint tenants with rights of survivorship.” Jack and Jane only transferred title to the San Francisco and Sausalito properties when they bought or sold the homes.

Jack and Jane are separating and wish to know whether the properties are separate or community property.

The answers Jack and Jane seek are found in various California laws like, California Family Code Sections 760, 2581, and many more. These laws are collectively referred to as California community property law and are widely misunderstood.

The purpose of this article is twofold: One, to introduce you to the fundamentals of California community property law, and two, to give you a method to determine whether property, which includes assets, debts, income, and expenses, is separate or community property.

The Basics: California Community Property Explained

Community property is real or personal property owned by the community. The community is comprised of two people, either spouses or domestic partners, and is formed when a couple legally marries or registers a domestic partnership.

A spouse’s community property interest arises at the time property is acquired, and isn’t affected by a change in the form of the property (e.g. incorporating a business, selling stock and reinvesting the proceeds in livestock.)

All property acquired during marriage and before separation, other than by gift or inheritance, is presumptively community property.*

“Presumptively” means, it is a legal assumption that any and all property acquired during marriage is community property, but the community property presumption is rebuttable. A spouse or partner may rebut the presumption by producing a preponderance of evidence that proves the property is separate, not community. For example, if a spouse inherits $100,000 during marriage, the law presumes it is community property, but the heir may trace the funds to establish the property was inherited and rebut the presumption.

If a married couple acquires real estate during marriage in joint form (tenancy in common, joint tenancy, tenancy by the entirety, or as community property) the community property presumption applies, and can only be rebutted by a clear statement in the deed or another valid written agreement that the property is separate property, not community property.

The character of any property acquired before or during marriage or after separation may be changed by agreement of the spouses (legal transmutation) from separate property to community property, community property to separate property, and the separate property of one spouse to the separate property of the other spouse. To legally transmute the character of real or personal property of significant value on or after January 1, 1985, the transmutation must be evidenced by a document that includes an express declaration “made, joined in, consented to, or accepted by the spouse whose interest is adversely affected.” Documents that commonly transmute property include prenuptial agreements, property deeds, transmutation agreements, trusts, and marital settlement agreements.

Separate property also may become community property if it is so commingled with community property that tracing it to a separate property source is impossible. For the sake of clarity, the simple act of depositing separate and community property funds into a single account, whether held in one spouse’s name or jointly, does not constitute commingling unless it is impossible for a party to trace the commingled funds to their separate property origin.

The Method: How to determine if property is separate or community property

  1. Identify the property
  2. Ascertain the date(s) the property was acquired
  3. Determine if the property was a gift, inheritance or derived from a separate property
  4. Establish whether the property was legally transmuted
  5. Ascertain if the property was commingled

The Example: Jack and Jane’s Properties

Jack’s San Francisco apartment was acquired and paid in full before marriage. Title to the property was held as “Jack, a single man.” Jack and Jane did not sign a prenuptial or post-nuptial or any other documents wherein Jack expressly declared that he was transmuting the separate property character of the apartment, and no improvements were made to the apartment during marriage therefore, Jack’s apartment is Jack’s separate property. If community property funds had been used to pay the principal of a mortgage or otherwise increase the equity in Jack’s apartment, the community property would have acquired an interest in Jack’s separate property apartment. Learn about Moore-Marsden here.

Jack and Jane’s salary and bonuses that are “the fruits of a spouse’s expenditure of time, talent and labor during marriage and before separation are community property.” Thus, the down payment on the Sausalito house was community property.

Jack and Jane acquired the Sausalito house during marriage, and took title as joint tenants with rights of survivorship without a separate property reservation set forth in the deed. Jack and Jane did not sign any agreements expressly declaring that the character of the house was anything other than community property therefore, the house is community property.

If you would like California community property law explained further and applied to the relevant facts of your life, please schedule a consulting session now.

*Hogoboom & King, California Practice Guide: Family Law (Rutter 2017) Section 8:77 citing California Family Code Sections 770(a)(2)), 760, 771(a), 772; Marriage of Bonds (2000) 24 C4th 1, 12, Marriage of Lehman (1998) 18 C4th 169, 177

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Blog, California Family Law, Divorce, Method, Property Assets, house

Helene L Taylor

Helene L. Taylor, California Family Law Consulting Attorney, Legal Strategist, Peace Activist

It’s easy to see divorce as a painful path you must walk alone without the expertise of a lawyer because you don’t know who to trust. But compassionate competent  advice is available and empowers you to solve salient problems consciously.

I’m Helene L. Taylor. I’m a former San Francisco trial lawyer who has, for 27 years, worked with the most formidable attorneys, judges, and experts in Hawaii and California. I’ve helped over a thousand people mediate, litigate, and resolve contentious complex divorce issues in Marin, OC, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Napa, LA, Silicon Valley, and beyond. I’m also divorced.

If you want trustworthy legal advice and strategies you can use to navigate the legal system and negotiate settlement agreements, Speak to Me.

CLIENT PRAISE

"Helene understands human behavior, and has a gift for deescalating conflict. I felt safe with Helene representing me during a complicated divorce. We've been friends ever since my divorce sixteen years ago." ~Toni Wroolie, PhD, Clinical Associate Professor, Psychiatry, Stanford University Medicine

"When I realized that I was getting a divorce I knew I needed to find a guide. She’d need to be smart, soulful, kind, and know her way around the legal system like nobody’s business. I loved working with Helene because she covered all of those bases beautifully, and she made it possible for me to move through my divorce with peace of mind and confidence" ~Laurie Wagner, 27powers.org

"Helene gently challenged me to consider which outcome would be best for my daughter and I, and gave me the courage and consistency I needed to pursue it successfully. I learned so much about myself as a result. Helene's is a compassionate and strategic approach. On a personal level, Helene is exceptionally positive and inspiring. I feel blessed to have received Helene's help through a challenging divorce during the pandemic." ~NC, Mother, Los Angeles Small Business Owner
Helene L Taylor

Receive Love Notes from Helene

* indicates required
Maritial Status (choose 1)

search

All are Welcome

“Helene’s answers put a smile on my face, and gave me great hope about the path I am taking.”

Latest Posts

  • Why do wealthy women marry? Jeff Bezos’s former spouse Mackenzie Scott Remarries, and JLo ponders the need for marriage
  • Who will keep the house in a California divorce?
  • Can you withdraw $200,000 penalty-free from a retirement account under the CARES Act in 2020?

Post Categories

BY APPOINTMENT

Marin County California
100 Shoreline Highway Mill Valley, California 94941

San Francisco, California
One Market Street, California 94105
Email: hello(at)heleneltaylor.com
Phone: 415-968-3028
Fax: 415-329-2019

Serving Marin & San Francisco California & Hawaii since 2001 & 1994.
Copyright 2017. Helene L. Taylor. Terms, Conditions & Disclaimers. Privacy Policy.

Privacy Policy

“May those who find themselves in trackless, fearful wildernesses—the children, the aged, the unprotected—be guarded by beneficent celestials.”

“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God.”